Developed by the Krach Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue, the xGTT Standard provides a common definition of what “trusted technology” means in practice, and a common way to evaluate it. It gives governments, companies, universities, and other institutions an evidence-based framework to assess whether the companies behind critical and emerging technologies can be trusted not only to deliver innovative technology, but also to operate consistently with democratic values.
AT A GLANCE
15
Tech Sectors
18
Techno-Democracies
31
Trusted Tech Criteria
100%
Public Sources
xGTT helps a broad range of leaders make faster, evidence-based decisions about the trustworthiness of companies they may buy from, invest in, or partner with. Its criteria cover both technological excellence and democratic values, and each user applies them under its own authority and for its own purposes:
01
Governments and procurement authorities
can integrate xGTT into procurement rules, requests for proposals (RFPs), and supply-chain vetting.
02
Defense Forces
can integrate it into military RFPs, procurement rules, and vetting of dual-use supply chains.
03
Enterprises and investors
can apply it to enhance vendor due diligence, supply-chain risk assessment, and partnership decisions.
04
Industry associations and manufacturers
can use it to demonstrate supplier trustworthiness, strengthen integration into global value chains, and expand access to trusted international markets.
05
Universities, research institutions, and standards bodies
can use it as a reference for policy development, academic research, and coordination among like-minded institutions.
The Global Trusted Tech Standard (xGTT) is an open standard published by the Krach Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue (the “Krach Institute”). Use of xGTT is subject to the xGTT Terms of Use available from the Krach Institute and your use of xGTT shall constitute your acceptance of those terms of use. The Krach Institute and affiliated entities disclaim all liability from the use of xGTT and users are advised to follow the standards for fact-based evaluations and may be subject to claims by third parties relating to your evaluation. No evaluation, rating, or score made using xGTT is a substitute for independent due diligence. Anyone considering a transaction or investment, or other decision involving an evaluated government, company, or organization should perform its own independent investigation and analysis and should not rely on any xGTT evaluation for that purpose.







